Staffing was discussed at several meetings
City staff examined cost and practical coverage. They treated human presence as something that could accompany a physical barrier, while repeatedly advising against relying on staffing to replace it.
Staffing & patrols
Follow proposals for staffing and patrols, the City’s cost estimates, and the distinction between adding personnel and replacing a barrier.
← All barrier designs and alternatives
2017–2018
Patrol was among the alternatives
The task force’s review included police presence, patrols, technology, and physical barriers. It distinguished measures that restrict access from measures that make intervention more likely.
Aug 2021
Around-the-clock staffing was proposed
Councilmember Tyron Hampton proposed staffing the bridge 24 hours a day. City Manager Steve Mermell said it had been suggested before, would likely cost several hundred thousand dollars annually, and was not feasible as a replacement. Mayor Victor Gordo proposed a model based on Old Pasadena’s hosts and guides: personnel who could observe, report concerns, and offer historical information.
Read the supporting record
Nov 2023
Staff explained the coverage problem
Deputy Director of Public Works and City Engineer Kris Markarian described continuous coverage, multiple personnel, liability concerns, and incidents outside ordinary working hours. Gordo asked for more work on trained security and a daytime human presence. Councilmember Steve Madison questioned response speed.
Read the supporting record
Jul 2024
Annual cost estimates were presented
The requested estimates were roughly $600,000 a year for private security and $1.16 million a year for law-enforcement coverage. Councilmember Justin Jones asked whether staffing was being ruled out because of cost, effectiveness, or both. Staff answered both.
Read the supporting record
Findings and limits
Staff assessed coverage, cost, response time, liability, and training. Their recommendation was to use personnel alongside physical protection.